(View entire post here)
Anyone who’s ever dreamed of pulling together a book has to face the daunting subject of what to include….and more specifically; what to leave out!
As I gradually assembled the permissions to reproduce the transit maps of the world it dawned on me that there was a lot more historical material for some cities than for others. My friend Mike who had been a tower of support since the beginning of the project suddenly gained a new role: he would be my editor.
Mike helped me to focus on the subject matter; what was it about the maps that made them interesting to designers. How were they similar – and why were they different. I began several months of thorough investigation about the nature of the maps and diagrams of subways. One aspect that I began to understand a lot better was why many transit maps have adopted the schematic solution as opposed to using maps that are true to the geography of their cities above.
This has had the added benefit of not just being the most effective way of depicting the complex system of tunnels beneath our feet but also has inspired designers because when well done they are often very beautiful in their own right. The London diagram is one of the greatest examples of this as it evokes a sense of balance and clarity. This is one of the reasons why Harry Beck’s original design for the London Tube has both stood the test of time and been emulated round the world by other transit operators. It has also inspired artists to play with the design concepts and come up with pieces like "The Great Bear" - now on display at London’s Tate Gallery




