(View entire post here)
Over the years, there has been considerable research demonstrating that high Morningstar ratings are not predictive of future performance. Some of these studies demonstrated little difference between the performance of five star and three star funds in the years after the rating was given.
A new study by Professors Morey and Gottesman of Pace University concludes the opposite. The study looked at Morningstar rated, domestic equity funds for the three year period from July, 2002-June, 2005. They concluded that “higher rated funds, for the most part, significantly outperform lower rated funds.”
So, should you run out and buy five star rated funds?
Not if you are interested in superior returns.
With minor exceptions, the study found that, in all star categories, index funds outperformed all of the rated mutual funds.
This finding is not mentioned in the “Conclusions” to the study, which focuses on the predictive power of the higher rated funds, thereby missing the point. Why should investors care if five star funds outperform four star funds, when index funds outperform five star funds?



