A tour through the centuries and through a bizarre Italian town in search of an unbelievable relic: the foreskin of Jesus Christ
In December 1983, a priest in the Italian hill town of Calcata shared shocking news with his congregation: The pride of their town, the foreskin of Jesus, had been stolen. Some postulated that it had been stolen by Satanists. Some said the priest himself was to blame. Some even pointed their fingers at the Vatican. In 2006, travel writer David Farley moved to Calcata, determined to find the missing foreskin, or at least find out the truth behind its disappearance. Farley recounts how the relic passed from Charlemagne to the papacy to a marauding sixteenth-century German solider before finally ending up in Calcata, where miracles occurred that made the sleepy town a major pilgrimage destination. Over the centuries, as Catholic theology evolved, the relic came to be viewed as something of an embarrassment, culminating in a 1900 Church decree that allowed the parish to display it only on New Year's Day.
An Irreverent Curiosity interweaves this history with the curious landscape of Calcata, a beautiful and untouched medieval village set atop four-hundred-fifty-foot cliffs, which now, due to the inscrutable machinations of Italian bureaucracy, is a veritable counterculture coven. Blending history, travel, and perhaps the oddest story in Christian lore, An Irreverent Curiosity is a weird and wonderful tale of conspiracy and misadventure.
Read David Farley's posts on the Penguin Blog.
Chapter 1
The Prepuce, the Priest, and the Wardrobe
As Don Dario Magnoni draped the sacred vestments over his apple-shaped body, the pinch in his stomach
blossomed into a knot. He had some bad news he'd been keeping from his congregation. He'd decided late one
recent night, after polishing off a bottle of cheap Montepulciano d'Abruzzo, that this Sunday would be the day to tell
them—after all, the New Year's Day procession was just weeks away. The reason for the knot of nerves was
that he didn't know how he was going to make the announcement to his small audience. Church attendance had
been decreasing since he arrived in the village in the early 1970s—now only a sprinkling of villagers regularly
attended the Sunday mass—and Dario hoped the chilly December weather would keep more of the faithful
from their weekly obligation. He straightened out his white chasuble and took a deep breath before sliding open the
door that connected his house to the adobe-like church.
"This year," Don Dario began the announcement, "the holy relic will not be exposed to the devotion of the
faithful. It has vanished. Sacrilegious thieves have taken it from my home." The priest paused, waiting for calamity to
ensue. But the smattering of worshippers simply stared back at him in silence, a reaction Don Dario took as
indifference.
The holy relic that Don Dario spoke of wasn't just the residuum of any holy human—nor was it just any
body part. It was the carne vera sacra, "real holy flesh," as the people of Calcata admiringly referred to it. It
was the foreskin of Jesus Christ, the only piece of the Redeemer's body that he could have conceivably left on earth
after his ascension into heaven, jealously guarded over in this secluded medieval hill town for the past four and a
half centuries.
But now in 1983 the relic was gone. And most likely for good. After mass, some of the parishioners retreated to
a nearby bar. Amid the posters and scarves of the Lazio football team, the churchgoers sipped espresso and
prosecco and shook their heads in disbelief. "Who would take our cherished relic?" someone said without looking for
an answer. But ancient Giuseppina shook her tiny fragile fist in the air and said, "I know who took
it—they took it."
* * *
The mystery of just what the Holy Foreskin was doing in the priest's house—in a shoe box at the back of
his wardrobe, no less—and why and how it disappeared, kicked off the most cryptic case of relic theft in
centuries. Who would steal it? And what would they want with it?
For the last century, the Church's official position on the foreskin was one of silence, set out in a decree on
February 3, 1900. Pope Leo XIII stated that anyone who talked about, wrote about, or commented on the Holy
Foreskin would face excommunication. The Church feared the relic was being sought out simply as an "irreverent
curiosity." The people of Calcata could still hold their New Year's Day procession with the relic, but that would be the
only time each year it would be on display—and it would have to be from a distance and without commentary.
The decree also stated that the word "prepuzio," foreskin, should no longer be used when referring to the
object inside the reliquary. "Reliquia," relic, or "cosa," thing, would be just fine from now on.
But long before this "thing" had its quiet falling-out with the Church, Christ's foreskin was one of the most
popular relics in Christendom. Saints pined for it: St. Catherine of Siena, the fourteenth-century Doctor of the
Church and self-proclaimed spiritual bride of Christ, said she wore the foreskin around her ring finger; that
same century, St. Bridget of Sweden claimed to have had a vision of the Virgin Mary, who told her that the Holy
Foreskin (then kept in Rome) was the real deal. Several popes wrote about the pious prepuce and/or granted
indulgences to those who celebrated it, including Leo III (birth unknown–816), Innocent III (1160–1216), Eugenius IV
(1388–1447), Pius II (1405–1464), Sixtus IV (1414–1484), Sixtus V (1521–1590), Urban VIII (1568–1644), Innocent X
(1574–1655), Alexander VII (1599–1667), and Benedict XIII (1649–1730). The thirteenth-century saint Bonaventure
tried settling a theological dispute about the foreskin's existence. And many of the players in the sixteenth-century
Reformation (or those who inspired it)—Jan Hus, Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Erasmus among
them—have weighed in. While in Rome, nineteenth-century French writer Stendhal had hoped to visit Calcata
to see it, and several other scribes have included it in their novels: James Joyce (Ulysses), Umberto Eco
(Baudolino), Chuck Palahniuk (Choke), Jonathan Gash (The Grail Tree), and José
Saramago (The Gospel According to Jesus Christ).
Christ's flesh and blood are central to Catholic belief. "Take, eat: this is my body," Christ said at the Last
Supper, as recorded in 1 Corinthians 11:24. And thus the Eucharist, that tasteless wafer the priest gently
places on the tongues of the faithful, was born as a substitute to the Savior's flesh. The Lateran Council in 1215,
however, insisted—though not unanimously—that during the Eucharist ceremony, the wafer actually
became the flesh of Christ once it arrived in the middle of the devotee's throat. That a piece of Christ's actual
flesh—and his foreskin, no less—could still be floating around posed a theological dilemma (and,
undoubtedly, some discomfort) within the Church over the centuries. But also, the enduring
enthusiasm—among the laity and, at times, within the Church—for the Holy Foreskin is a reflection of
the relic as the literal manifestation of the Eucharist.
It also made a lot of money. In the Middle Ages, a great relic meant pilgrims, which meant money, prestige, and
power to those in control of a relic—whether it was an abbot, a prince, or even the pope. The foreskin of
Christ was one of those cash-cow curios that packed in the pilgrims. So much so, it was eventually copied and
forged all over Europe. Depending on what you read, there were eight, twelve, fourteen, or eighteen different Holy
Foreskins in various European towns during the Middle Ages. Coulombs, a French village near Chartres, had one.
Chartres also had one; as did the French towns of Metz, Charroux, Conques, Langres, Fécamp, and Puy-
en-Velay. Auvergne had two. And the French weren't the only ones with a holy foreskin obsession. Pieces of pious
penises could be found in Hildesheim in Germany and Antwerp in Belgium. Santiago de Compostela, the famed
pilgrimage town in the far northwestern corner of Spain, had one too. And, of course, there was the foreskin in
Rome (the earliest and the one that ended up in Calcata).
Relics in general, and the Holy Foreskin in particular, are products of another age, a time when saints were
posthumous medieval rock stars, pilgrims their devout groupies, and monks their roadies. The quest for salvation
pervaded the being of every devout European, and the supernatural and natural were one and the same;
thunderstorms, large gusts of wind, and dreams were often seen as acts of God (or, at times, Satan). Piety was the
prescription for life's pain. And one of the main ways to exercise this piety was through the saints and their relics.
The saints, particularly the early martyrs, had gone through a kind of suffering similar to Christ's when he made his
sacrifice for all of humanity. They had achieved, according to the faithful, perfection in their deaths. So, taking the
Eucharist—a symbolic part of Christ's body—at an altar that housed the bones of the martyrs and saints
was a heavily loaded spiritual experience that was grounded in the physical. Believers considered saints—the
Redeemer's henchmen, VIP residents of heaven—to be present at their tombs and at the spot where their
relics lay. Praying to a part of their body was like tugging at their pant leg: "Hey, I'm down here and I have a
request."
In centuries past, the Christian faithful relied on relics to do things that medicine, the government, the lottery,
and recreational drugs do today. Relics granted wishes. They gave fortune and restored health. They eased pain and
sorrow. They even produced visions for the devout. The more miracles a saint performed via their relics, the more
popular and valuable that relic became. In fact, miracles were expected. When a relic showed up in a town or
monastery for the first time, worshippers would watch carefully for possible miracles. A dead relic (i.e., one that did
not perform miracles) was useless. Having a miracle-spewing remain of a saint in your town's church, however, was
like having the godfather's ear: Your wishes and desires could be granted. A group of medieval monks worried
about a fast-spreading disease, for example, didn't lock themselves inside their rooms; they plunged their patron
saint's bones in a vat of wine and then commenced imbibing, hoping it would make them immune.
The Holy Foreskin, an actual piece of Jesus Christ, was, of course, the grandest relic of all. Before the relic's
arrival in Calcata, it had been kept in Rome's Sancta Sanctorum—the "Holy of Holies"—where it mingled
with the heads of apostles, among other esteemed objects. But how did the Santissimo Prepuzio, "the most
holy foreskin," quietly go from invaluable to verboten in the course of several centuries, culminating in the 1900
threat of excommunication? And did this have anything to do with its 1983 disappearance?
* * *
My wife, Jessie, and I had actually been to Calcata. We were spending a few months in Rome and had heard
about a bewitching medieval village plopped on a hill filled with artists and bohemian types. During our daylong
visit, the foreskin may have come up in conversation, but I must have quickly forgotten it. Then one day, while we
were sitting at a French café a few blocks from our apartment in New York's West Village, Jessie brought up
Calcata. For the last year, she'd had a yen for a big trip—not just a few weeks, but a long adventure.
"Remember that cool hill town we went to when we lived in Rome?" she said. "Weren't we briefly thinking about
moving there? Maybe we should think about it again."
"I don't know," I said, hoping it would buy me some time. In the past few months, I'd already nixed Poland,
Croatia, the Czech Republic, Spain, and Mexico. The idea of moving to a small hill town north of Rome filled with
artists sounded romantic on paper, but I didn't really want to give up my New York life just yet. Working as a
restaurant critic and a freelance writer, I'd spend my nights attending rooftop cocktail parties thrown by various
tourist boards, eating lavish meals at expensive restaurants that someone else was paying for, and jetting off to
Europe on assignment for weeks at a time.
But then she brought up the relic. "Remember, there was that bizarre relic in Calcata? The Holy Foreskin? You
love stuff like that."
She suddenly had my attention.
"And don't you remember when we were there, someone told us that it was stolen? Now, that could be
interesting."
When Jessie and I had been living in Rome four years earlier, I'd take visiting friends and family around the city,
and at the end of the day they'd say, "Gee, I didn't really ask for the weird-relics tour of Rome, but it sure was
interesting"; I hadn't even realized that my tour consisted of dragging them from church to church showing them
the arm of St. Francis Xavier (in the Gesù) or the entire three-hundred-year-old body of St. Giuseppe Maria
Tomasi (in the Church of Sant' Andrea della Valle) or the place that really got me off: the Church of Santi
Vicenzo e Anastasio, directly opposite the Trevi Fountain, which boasts the hearts, livers, spleens, kidneys, and
pancreases of every pope from Sixtus V (1585–1590) to Leo XIII (1878–1903).
My fascination with relics began, at least indirectly, with my childhood upbringing as a Catholic. There were no
relics in my church, St. Peter Claver, named after the seventeenth-century Spanish missionary whose vocation was
helping (i.e., baptizing) African slaves ("I am the slave of the negroes forever!" he proclaimed). In fact, there was
almost nothing to stimulate the senses, making it a shining example of post–Second Vatican Council church. The
Council (also called Vatican II), which was in session from 1962 to 1965, was focused on bringing worshippers into
"active participation" in the church. This meant Latin was out and the vernacular was in. Though Vatican II didn't
address architecture directly (just as it didn't address relics directly), the way churches were built after Vatican II
dramatically changed. St. Peter Claver was a white-stone building dominated by a glass wall on one side, which let in
natural light. Gone were the dark, imposing Houses of God, replaced by the more functionalist and modern Houses
of the People of God. Entrances were more welcoming (i.e., walls of glass) and the altar was moved forward so the
priest could be closer to the people. Though the matter wasn't specifically addressed in the Council, by the late
1960s, priests had stopped performing mass with their backs to the parishioners. The result of all these changes,
however, was a Catholic mass experience devoid of magic and mystery. At least that's what it seemed to me when
my parents would drag me to church every Sunday. I really only have two memories from my churchgoing days:
having to bring my older brother's and sister's Led Zeppelin, Ozzy Osbourne, and AC/DC albums to our afterschool
catechism so the teacher could show us the surreptitious Satanic influence and a play I once took part in on
Christmas Day in which I played one of the three gift-bearing kings. I zoned out during the play and failed at my
one obligation: Instead of putting the ceramic goblet down in front of the crib along with the other gifts, I held
on to it until the very end.
But then something interesting happened: I took my first trip to Europe. I was twenty years old, and save
for alcohol-fueled trips to Mexico in high school I hadn't been out of the country. In California, it seemed like there
was no history. Everything was new and shiny and oversized. Europe was, in some ways, the antithesis: The
cars, restaurant portions, and even the dogs seemed to have shrunk a few sizes. As a result, I became infatuated
with all things European, from the nonchalance to the palimpsest of history that played a role in the everyday life of
people.
But it was the grand cathedrals that really mesmerized me most: the Baroque interiors, the cherubs
floating heavenward in a partly cloudy dome, the larger-than-life sculptures of saints looking down, and the ornate
altars. For the first time, I was inspired by something inside a church. I wasn't ready to return to the Catholic fold,
but I could see the appeal of attending a mass for an hour every Sunday. In the old churches and cathedrals of
Europe, God wasn't an abstraction; God—and his army of saints—were everywhere in the form of
paintings and statues.
And, of course, relics. There, on display (usually in a side chapel) were skulls and femur bones and pinky fingers
and sometimes entire bodies. I was intrigued for other reasons too: These weren't just the remains of
saints; they were the curios of a different time and space of human thought and philosophy, when all actions
were attributed to God, a way of thinking that's been in fatal decline since the industrial and scientific revolutions.
Relics represented a time when death was so near to us that we put it on display. I came back from that first trip to
Europe infected with a new curiosity about the world. I had, in the words of the Church, an "irreverent curiosity." I
got off gawking at relics—the more bizarre, the better. And this relic in Calcata sounded like the strangest and
grandest of all.
Back at that outdoor café in New York, an eternity's worth of puns ran through my head. So did images
of myself chatting up Italian priests and querying the Vatican about one of Christianity's most curious relics.
What if, I thought, I tried to find out who stole it? Staring across the street as smartly dressed
professionals raced for the subway to get to the office, I said, "Okay! Let's do it."
Jessie flashed me a look of surprise and I asked about the earliest possible date we could go. We ordered
another round of cappuccinos and the planning began.
* * *
Before I stepped foot on Italian soil, I got in touch with an American woman I'd previously met who had lived in
Calcata for years. Louise McDermott sold rare and out-of-print English language books about Italy from her home in
Calcata and seemed like an endless source of information. She sold me a few books via mail order, including a
pamphlet-size book she had written about the history of Calcata. When I told her about my quest—that I
wanted to find the Holy Foreskin—she seemed intrigued yet pessimistic. "The relic is the reason my husband
and I moved here from Rome," she wrote to me in an e-mail. "But the Church and the people here are very
embarrassed about it. I don't think you're going to get very far." On behalf of a scholar in California, she had
recently paid a visit to Don Dario—the priest under whose watch the foreskin had disappeared and, perhaps,
the only person who really knew what had happened to the relic. "He doesn't speak English, of course," she
wrote. "He isn't very lucid. And to be honest, he tends to look upon the wine when it's red . . . or white or rosé, for
that matter." And then, to up the intrigue, she added, "After lots of probing, it looks as if 'stolen' isn't the correct
word; 'disappeared' is more likely."
But Louise seemed willing to help. In fact, in her last e-mail before I left she promised to do what she could to
facilitate a meeting with Don Dario.
I felt good about what I was about to undertake. And through a generous local named Alessandro, I'd even
secured a nice, small apartment smack in the center of the village. But a couple weeks before my departure, I
received an e-mail from Alessandro: "First of all, I sadly want to inform you . . ." the e-mail began. My first
thought, of course, was that the apartment I'd rented wasn't available or that he was going to suddenly jack up the
rent. But it was worse. Louise was dead; she'd suddenly and unexpectedly died in her sleep. And, of course,
with her went all her secrets and theories and historical knowledge about the Holy Foreskin and Calcata.